Háskóli Íslands Student Conference on the Medieval North 2.0

Theme

Stirring up trouble: Antagonists, Outlaws, Troublemakers, & Rebels

Abstract

Medieval alchemists, despite great optimism and strenuous efforts, never achieved their dream of transmuting base metals into gold. Yet near the end of the twelfth century, the Icelandic abbot Karl Jónsson wrote of a transformation equally dramatic and almost as unlikely: how an obscure outlaw-priest from the Faroe Islands successfully fashioned himself into the king of Norway. Sverrisaga chronicles the contentious ascent of Sverrir Sigurðarson, arguably the most disruptive troublemaker in Norwegian history, given his central role in Norway’s civil wars. This paper uses Sverrir’s narrative to evaluate the process by which an individual is transformed from one social status into another—in this case, from renegade to sole ruler of his country.

Medieval texts featuring saints, bishops and kings often depict their subjects as divinely predestined for office, or instead attribute their change in status to a single decisive event such as a battle or coronation ceremony. This tendency can obscure the many cumulative factors underlying and contributing to the transformation. I argue that Sverrir’s metamorphosis was neither predetermined nor instantaneous, but instead the result of a multifaceted process beginning in his youth and continuing throughout his contested reign. I propose a more fluid and expansive set of criteria by which personal transformation may be recognised and understood. The paper is part of a larger dissertation that uses the same criteria to assess other twelfth-century narratives of individuals in the process of becoming bishops or kings. Through this approach, I hope to lay a foundation for broader research into the ways in which individuals have redefined themselves, moved up and down the social order and in so doing, contributed incrementally to political and ecclesiastical changes in the medieval Scandinavian world.

From Renegade to Ruler: Personal Transformation and Self-Fashioning in Sverrisaga

Yesterday, we heard two excellent presentations that were essentially about transformation. The first was from Simon Hauke, who traced the evolution of Hildr's character through several different versions of Hjaðningavig. The second was from Vitor Fortuna, who looked at the radical transformation of the whole concept of vikingr across several centuries and cultures.

I'm also interested in transformation, but in a very different sense: Rather than looking at how characters and cultures are transformed through the re-telling of a story, I look at how story-tellers perceived and wrote about transformation that happened in the lives of their subjects. Personal transformation, or metamorphosis. There were many different types of personal transformation happening in the medieval North: children were becoming adults, apprentices were becoming masters, pagans were becoming Christians, soldiers were becoming crusaders, rural peasants were becoming urban peasants, just to name a few.

I'm going to focus on one, very limited type of personal transformation: Becoming a king. It has the advantage of being well-represented in saga narratives, and there would seem to be pretty clear obvious signs of transformation--if people call you King so-and-so, at some point prior to that they called you Prince, or "my Lord," or they just didn't call you at all.

So... How does one get to be king?

If you've watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail, you know at least two possibilities: "The Lady of the Lake," says King Arthur to the peasant, "her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence, that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur—that is why I am your king!" So, in other words pre-destination? Perhaps heredity? A ceremony involving the bestowing of a sword, or even a crown?

The cheeky peasant retorts to the king, "supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony!" So, perhaps one becomes king through consensus? By election? Or through a violent uprising?