Sermon for November 30th, 2014 - Revision history

Iraneal at 06:59, 26 November 2014

2014-11-26T06:59:53Z

Iraneal at 06:20, 26 November 2014

2014-11-26T06:20:39Z

Iraneal at 05:18, 26 November 2014

2014-11-26T05:18:18Z

Iraneal at 04:04, 26 November 2014

2014-11-26T04:04:28Z

Iraneal at 02:58, 26 November 2014

2014-11-26T02:58:38Z

Iraneal at 02:47, 26 November 2014

2014-11-26T02:47:14Z

Iraneal at 02:03, 26 November 2014

2014-11-26T02:03:56Z

Iraneal at 23:01, 25 November 2014

2014-11-25T23:01:06Z

Iraneal at 22:59, 25 November 2014

2014-11-25T22:59:04Z

Iraneal at 20:22, 25 November 2014

2014-11-25T20:22:20Z

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Today is the first Sunday in Advent.  This Sunday, and for the next several weeks, I'll be preachig a sermon series called "Advent Encounters."  We'll look at the stories in the bible surrounding the birth of Jesus, and in particular how his birth brought unlikely people together in interesting ways.
-I belive that this story, the Christmas story, still has the power today to bring unlikely people together in interesting ways, life-transforming ways, around the person of Jesus.  So let's see what, together, we can learn from this diverse cast of characters that can shine the bright light of hope into our darkest, coldest winter nights.
+We begin with the strangest, most unlikely cast of characters of all--Jesus' own family tree. In the King James version they are known as the Gat family.  You know...Abraham B. Gat, Isaac B. Gat, Jacob B. Gat...not sure what the "B" stood for, but I always thought it was neat how they all passed on the same middle initial!
-We begin with the strangest, most unlikely, most diverse cast of characters of all -- Jesus' own family tree. In the familiar King James version they are known as the Gat family.  You know...Abraham B. Gat, Isaac B. Gat, Jacob B. Gat...not sure what the "B" stood for, but I always thought it was neat how they all passed on the same middle initial!
+Since we're talking about geneology and family trees today, I thought I'd share the following story:
-−
-And since we're talking about geneology and family trees, I thought I'd share the following story:
 A man was researching his ancestors, and came across some information on his great-great uncle, Remus Starr, who was hanged for horse stealing and train robbery in Montana in 1889.  He also found a photograph of Remus, showing him standing on the gallows.  On the back of the picture were the words: Remus Starr: Horse thief, sent to Montana Territorial Prison, 1885. Escaped 1887, robbed the Montana Flyer six times.  Caught by Pinkerton Detectives, convicted and hanged, 1889.
@@ Line 27: / Line 25: @@
 The greatest story ever told, the best selling book of all time, begins with a geneology--one we tend to skip right over because it is just a list of strange names tied together with a string of begats.  This is a mistake, because in that long list of strange names are hundreds of encounters, hundreds of fascinating stories, some which we know well, some which are in the Bible but unfamiliar to us, and some which are completely lost to the pages of time and history.
-Contrary to what many of us were taught growing up, I don't think this geneology is meant to be taken literally, at least not in the modern sense of the word "geneology."  At the very least, that's because it ends with Joseph, who we are told is not genetically related to Jesus at all, but is rather his adoptive father.  As someone who was adopted by my own step-father, I find great comfort in that--shared genes are not required to be part of a family tradition.
+I don't think this geneology is meant to be taken literally, at least not in the modern sense of the word "geneology."  At the very least, that's because it ends with Joseph, who is not genetically related to Jesus at all, but is rather his adoptive father.  As someone who was adopted by my own step-father, I find great comfort in that--shared genes are not required to be part of a family tradition.
-But there are other problems with this list as a geneology:  For one, it doesn't agree at all with the geneology of Jesus found in Luke, which is also supposed to represent Joseph's side of the family.  It also doesn't agree with geneologies in the Old Testament of some of the people who are part of it.  In fact, it doesn't even agree with itself--Matthew tells us there are three sets of fourteen generations, but no matter how you actually count his list, you come up short by quite a few.
+But there are other problems with this list as a geneology:  For one, it doesn't agree at all with the geneology of Jesus found in Luke, which is also Joseph's side of the family.  It doesn't agree with geneologies in the Old Testament of some of the people who are part of it.  In fact, it doesn't even agree with itself--Matthew tells us there are three sets of fourteen generations, but no matter how you actually count his list, you come up short by quite a few.
 The ancients were not as obsessed with historical accuracy as we are today.  In fact, geneologies of ancient and even late medieval kings often contain so many figures from mythology and legend that it is highly doubtful that anyone took them literally.
@@ Line 41: / Line 39: @@
 In verse three of our geneology, we read of "Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar."  Judah and Tamar were not married when they begat Perez and Zerah.  In fact, Tamar was Judah's daughter-in-law, and we read in Genesis 38 that one day she dressed herself like a prostitute and waited for her father-in-law, who, not recognizing her, requested her services. And so, Judah begat twins (Perez and Zerah) by Tamar.
-Scandal number two: Skip a couple of generations, and we read in verse five that "Salmon [was] the father of Boaz by Rahab."  This is Rahab from the book of Joshua, as the Israelites are about to mount a siege against the mighty city of Jericho. Joshua 2:1: "Then Joshua son of Nun sent two men secretly from Shittim as spies, saying, “Go, view the land, especially Jericho.” So they went, and entered the house of a prostitute whose name was Rahab, and spent the night there.  Delicately, of course, the Bible does not say why Joshua's men went straight to a house of ill-repute, nor what they did while spending the night there.
+Scandal number two: Skip a couple of generations, and we read in verse five that "Salmon [was] the father of Boaz by Rahab."  This is Rahab from the book of Joshua, as the Israelites are about to mount a siege against the mighty city of Jericho. Joshua 2:1: "Then Joshua son of Nun sent two men secretly from Shittim as spies, saying, Go, view the land, especially Jericho. So they went, and entered the house of a prostitute whose name was Rahab, and spent the night there."  Delicately, of course, the Bible does not say why Joshua's men went straight to a house of ill-repute, nor what they did while spending the night there.
 Scandal number three occurs immediately after number two: "and Boaz [was] the father of Obed by Ruth.  Now the story of Boaz and Ruth, in the book of Ruth, is a beautiful love story, and one many of us are familiar with.  But if you read closely, it's at least rated PG-13, or worse.  In fact, it may be the original 50 shades of Gray.
@@ Line 47: / Line 45: @@
 Boaz is a rich man.  Ruth is young, attractive, foreign, and not-so-rich. They've met a couple of times, but there is a wide gulf that separates them.  Ruth's mother-in-law, Naomi, helps her come up with a plan. She tells Ruth in 3:4,  [Tonight], "when he lies down, observe the place where he lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down; and he will tell you what to do.”  It is well known among Biblical scholars that "feet" in Hebrew is usually a euphemisim for another part of the body entirely.  Anyone hearing this story in ancient Israel would have turned bright read, stared at the ceiling, or laughed nervously at the scandal of this story.
-Scandal number four: "And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah."  Bathsheba's name isn't even mentioned in the verse, but we all know this scandalous encounter: King David, rooftop.  Bathsheba, rooftop.  The begatting begins.  Uriah ends.  Scandal all over the place.
+Scandal number four: "And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah."  Bathsheba's name isn't even mentioned in the verse, but we all know this scandalous encounter: King David, rooftop.  Bathsheba, rooftop, naked.  The begatting begins.  Uriah ends.  Scandal all over the place.
-Scandal number five is the very last one on the list: "Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born." No begatting here.  We often fail to appreciate the scandal because we know what's going on behind the scenes, but it's pretty simple.  In fact, rumors that Jesus was the illigetimate child of some other, human, father persisted all the way into the third century after his birth.
+Scandal number five is the very last one on the list: "Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born."  We often fail to appreciate the scandal because we know what's going on behind the scenes, but it's pretty simple.  In fact, rumors that Jesus was the illigetimate child of some other, human, father persisted all the way into the third century after his birth.
-Five scandals in Jesus' family tree.  Five scandals in the story that the author of Matthew is setting up for us about his hero, the Messiah.  But there is more than just scandal.  There is also great faithfulness.  So in the immortal words of Paul Harvey, here's "the rest of the story."
+Five scandals in Jesus' family tree. But there's more than just scandal. There is also great faithfulness.  So in the immortal words of Paul Harvey, here's "the rest of the story."
 Long before Tamar dressed as a prostitute and seduced her father-in-law, her husband had died, leaving her childless--without anyone to take care of her in her later years.  Under Jewish law, her husband's brother was supposed to take her in, and provide her heirs to carry on the family line.  Judah's second son refused to do this, so he promised his third son to her when he became old enough.  But years passed, and Judah forgot his promise.  Finally, Tamar took action, out of desperation, but also out of faithfulness to her deceased husband, to Jewish law and custom, and to the belief that God would provide for her when no one else would.  When Judah finally discovers what Tamar had done, he says "She is more in the right than I, since I did not give her to my son Shelah."
@@ Line 63: / Line 61: @@
 The faithfulness of Mary is well known.  I've discussed her initiative in an earlier sermon this year about Jesus' first miracle, the water into wine.  And Mary's encounter with her cousin Elizabeth is actually the subject of next week's sermon, so I don't want to give too much away today.
-Near the beginning of the sermon, I said that the author of Matthew chose his introduction, his cast of background characters with great care.  He certainly chose different characters than his counterpart, the author of Luke, and his message is different than the one found in Luke.  So what is the message of Matthew?  What is that overlooked message of the geneology that begins the first chapter of the first book of the New Testament?
+Near the beginning of the sermon, I said that the author of Matthew chose his introduction, his cast of background characters with great care.  He certainly chose different characters than his counterpart, the author of Luke, and his message is different than the one found in Luke.  So what is the message of Matthew?  What is that overlooked message of the overlooked geneology that begins the first chapter of the first book of the New Testament?
-The encounters from that geneology that I've highlighted today all revolve around scandalous situations.  They all demonstrate acts of great faithfulness.  They also feature five strong, independent women, which is pretty amazing coming from a 1st century Patriarchal culture that seldom recognized the existence of women, and almost never in geneological lists.  Incidentally, all of the women except Mary are foreigners, outsiders to the Jewish faith. I think that's significant, too.
+The encounters that I've highlighted today all revolve around scandalous situations.  But they also demonstrate acts of great faithfulness.  They feature five strong, independent women, which is pretty amazing coming from a 1st century Patriarchal culture that seldom recognized the existence of women, and almost never in geneological lists.  Incidentally, all of the women except Mary are foreigners, outsiders to the Jewish faith. I think that's significant, too.
-I think part of the message the gospel of Matthew is conveying, right out of the gate, is that this Savior, this Messiah, is for everyone: Men and women, natives and foreigners, rich and poor, powerful and vulnerable alike.  But I think there's also something else, something even more powerful.
+Part of the message the gospel of Matthew is conveying is that this Savior, this Messiah, is for everyone: Men and women, natives and foreigners, rich and poor, powerful and vulnerable alike.  But I think there's also something else, something even more powerful.
 Like the people we have encountered in these stories, we are well acquainted with scandal.  Most of us put on a good show.  But if our deepest, darkest secrets were suddenly on display for the world to see, I think all of us would be mortified, embarassed, and ashamed.  And yet, Matthew reminds us, this is precisely the sort of thing God can use.  We are precisely the kind of people God uses to bring hope into the world.  By nature we are all sinners, but by the grace of God, we are all saints.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ==Advent Encounters: Saints & Sinners==
 Today is the first Sunday in Advent.  This Sunday, and for the next several weeks, I'll be preachig a sermon series called "Advent Encounters."  We'll look at the stories in the bible surrounding the birth of Jesus, and in particular how his birth brought unlikely people together in interesting ways.
@@ Line 36: / Line 35: @@
 The best modern day analogy I can think of to approximate the ancient geneology is the Facebook wall.  On my facebook wall (or profile) online, like many people, I have long lists of famous people, authors, or musicians I like--people who have influenced my own thinking and style.  By listing Woody Guthrie, John Denver, and Bruce Springsteen on my facebook wall, I'm not saying that I'm actually related to any of them.  But there is a sense in which I stand in their tradition.  I claim them as musical forebears; My own music is a product of their influence.
-So when Matthew sets his stage for the greatest drama of all time, he introduces the star of his show with a list of names--think of it as opening credits, or the giant scrolling words at the beginning of the Star Wars movies.  These names are carefully chosen to tell a story--several stories--to quickly relate a message to die-hard fans of Jewish history.  The message is this:
+So when the author of Matthew sets his stage for the greatest drama of all time, he introduces the star of his show with a list of names--think of it as opening credits, or the giant scrolling words at the beginning of the Star Wars movies.  These names are carefully chosen to tell a story--several stories--to quickly relate a message to die-hard fans of Jewish history.  What that message is, is the subject of today's sermon.  And it begins with scandal.
-Out of scandal and faithfulness is born hope.  Out of human initiative and divine intervention is born...a messiah.
+There are a lot of stories in this geneology, but I'm going to focus on five--five stories of scandalous encounters, the kind that our biblical authors present in "delicate" wording, like the humorous stories I told at the begining of this sermon.
-−
-We'll begin with the scandal.  There are a lot of stories in this geneology, but I'm going to focus on five--five stories of scandalous encounters, the kind that our biblical authors present in "delicate" wording, like the humorous stories I told at the begining of this sermon.
 In verse three of our geneology, we read of "Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar."  Judah and Tamar were not married when they begat Perez and Zerah.  In fact, Tamar was Judah's daughter-in-law, and we read in Genesis 38 that one day she dressed herself like a prostitute and waited for her father-in-law, who, not recognizing her, requested her services. And so, Judah begat twins (Perez and Zerah) by Tamar.
@@ Line 54: / Line 51: @@
 Scandal number five is the very last one on the list: "Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born." No begatting here.  We often fail to appreciate the scandal because we know what's going on behind the scenes, but it's pretty simple.  In fact, rumors that Jesus was the illigetimate child of some other, human, father persisted all the way into the third century after his birth.
-Five scandals in Jesus' family tree.  Five scandals in the story that Matthew is setting up for us about his hero, the Messiah.  But there is more than just scandal.  There is also great faithfulness.  There is the place where human initiative meets divine intervention.  So in the immortal words of Paul Harvey, here's "the rest of the story."
+Five scandals in Jesus' family tree.  Five scandals in the story that the author of Matthew is setting up for us about his hero, the Messiah.  But there is more than just scandal.  There is also great faithfulness.  So in the immortal words of Paul Harvey, here's "the rest of the story."
 Long before Tamar dressed as a prostitute and seduced her father-in-law, her husband had died, leaving her childless--without anyone to take care of her in her later years.  Under Jewish law, her husband's brother was supposed to take her in, and provide her heirs to carry on the family line.  Judah's second son refused to do this, so he promised his third son to her when he became old enough.  But years passed, and Judah forgot his promise.  Finally, Tamar took action, out of desperation, but also out of faithfulness to her deceased husband, to Jewish law and custom, and to the belief that God would provide for her when no one else would.  When Judah finally discovers what Tamar had done, he says "She is more in the right than I, since I did not give her to my son Shelah."
@@ Line 64: / Line 61: @@
 Bathsheba likely had little choice when King David summoned her to him. In the aftermath of her encounter with David, she loses her husband, Uriah.  Then she loses the child she has conceived with David.  Finally another child--Solomon--is born to her, but he is the youngest of David's children, the last in line for the throne, and the most vulnerable in the violent, ambitious, and often deadly politics of succession.  But Bathsheba is faithful.  She waits. And in David's old age, she takes initiative, enlisting the help of Nathan the prophet to plead and convince David to declare her son Solomon king.  Solomon, of course, goes on to be one of the greatest and most revered kings in the Old Testament.
-The faithfulness of Mary is well known.  I've discussed her initiative in an earlier sermon this year about Jesus' first miracle, the water into wine.  And Mary's encounter with her cousin Elizabeth is actually the subject of next week's sermon.
+The faithfulness of Mary is well known.  I've discussed her initiative in an earlier sermon this year about Jesus' first miracle, the water into wine.  And Mary's encounter with her cousin Elizabeth is actually the subject of next week's sermon, so I don't want to give too much away today.
-*Scandal + Faithfulness + Human Initiative + Divine Intervention = Jesus the Messiah = Hope.
+This is the message of Matthew's geneology:  Out of scandal and faithfulness is born hope.  Out of human initiative and divine intervention is born salvation for the world.  May all of your encounters this advent season bring hope, and may the story of Jesus the Savior become a part of your own family story this year and every year to come.

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 In the story of Ruth and Boaz, Ruth takes the initiative, literally, to win the affection of Boaz.  But long before this, in the very beginning of the story, she speaks to her mother-in-law Naomi these famous, faithful words: "Where you go, I will go, and where you stay, I will stay. Your people will be my people, and your God will be my God."
-Bathsheba likely had little choice when King David summoned her to him. In the aftermath of her encounter with David, she loses her husband, Uriah.  Then she loses the child she has conceived with David.  Finally another child--Solomon--is born to her, but he is the youngest of David's children, the last in line for the throne, and the most vulnerable in the violent, ambitious, and often deadly politics of succession.  Here, Bathsheba takes initiative:
+Bathsheba likely had little choice when King David summoned her to him. In the aftermath of her encounter with David, she loses her husband, Uriah.  Then she loses the child she has conceived with David.  Finally another child--Solomon--is born to her, but he is the youngest of David's children, the last in line for the throne, and the most vulnerable in the violent, ambitious, and often deadly politics of succession.  But Bathsheba is faithful.  She waits. And in David's old age, she takes initiative, enlisting the help of Nathan the prophet to plead and convince David to declare her son Solomon king.  Solomon, of course, goes on to be one of the greatest and most revered kings in the Old Testament.
-−
 *Scandal + Faithfulness + Human Initiative + Divine Intervention = Jesus the Messiah = Hope.

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 Scandal number three occurs immediately after number two: "and Boaz [was] the father of Obed by Ruth.  Now the story of Boaz and Ruth, in the book of Ruth, is a beautiful love story, and one many of us are familiar with.  But if you read closely, it's at least rated PG-13, or worse.  In fact, it may be the original 50 shades of Gray.
-Boaz is a rich man.  Ruth is young, attractive, foreign, and not-so-rich. They've met a couple of times, but there is a wide gulf that separates them.  Ruth's mother-in-law, Naomi, helps her come up with a plan. She tells Ruth in 3:4,  [Tonight], "when he lies down, observe the place where he lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down; and he will tell you what to do.”  It is well known among Biblical scholars that "feet" in Hebrew is often a euphemisim for another part of the body entirely.  Anyone hearing this story in ancient Israel would have turned bright read, stared at the ceiling, or laughed nervously at this scandalous part of the story.
+Boaz is a rich man.  Ruth is young, attractive, foreign, and not-so-rich. They've met a couple of times, but there is a wide gulf that separates them.  Ruth's mother-in-law, Naomi, helps her come up with a plan. She tells Ruth in 3:4,  [Tonight], "when he lies down, observe the place where he lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down; and he will tell you what to do.”  It is well known among Biblical scholars that "feet" in Hebrew is usually a euphemisim for another part of the body entirely.  Anyone hearing this story in ancient Israel would have turned bright read, stared at the ceiling, or laughed nervously at the scandal of this story.
-*geneology?  modern term.  what's the original?
+Scandal number four: "And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah."  Bathsheba's name isn't even mentioned in the verse, but we all know this scandalous encounter: King David, rooftop.  Bathsheba, rooftop.  The begatting begins.  Uriah ends.  Scandal all over the place.
-*generation count is off (14-14-12), doesn't match Luke's anyhow, or Old Testament geneologies.
-*all through Joseph anyhow.
-*family history as "facebook wall"
-*four/five women:  “It is,” concludes Father Raymond Brown in his magisterial 1993 study The Birth of the Messiah, “the combination of the scandalous or irregular union and of divine intervention through the women that explains best Matthew’s choice in the genealogy.”
 *Scandal + Faithfulness + Human Initiative + Divine Intervention = Jesus the Messiah = Hope.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 26 November 2014
Line 47:		Line 47:

	Scandal number three occurs immediately after number two: "and Boaz [was] the father of Obed by Ruth. Now the story of Boaz and Ruth, in the book of Ruth, is a beautiful love story, and one many of us are familiar with. But if you read closely, it's at least rated PG-13, or worse. In fact, it may be the original 50 shades of Gray.		Scandal number three occurs immediately after number two: "and Boaz [was] the father of Obed by Ruth. Now the story of Boaz and Ruth, in the book of Ruth, is a beautiful love story, and one many of us are familiar with. But if you read closely, it's at least rated PG-13, or worse. In fact, it may be the original 50 shades of Gray.
		+
		+	Boaz is a rich man. Ruth is young, attractive, foreign, and not-so-rich. They've met a couple of times, but there is a wide gulf that separates them. Ruth's mother-in-law, Naomi, helps her come up with a plan. She tells Ruth in 3:4, [Tonight], "when he lies down, observe the place where he lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down; and he will tell you what to do.” It is well known among Biblical scholars that "feet" in Hebrew is often a euphemisim for another part of the body entirely. Anyone hearing this story in ancient Israel would have turned bright read, stared at the ceiling, or laughed nervously at this scandalous part of the story.

	*geneology? modern term. what's the original?		*geneology? modern term. what's the original?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 26 November 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:
	A few days later, the same man learned about his great, great uncle Willie, a convicted murderer who had been condemned to die in the Electric chair. Uncle Willie's entry in the family history book read like this: "Uncle William occupied a chair of applied electronics at one of our nation's leading institutions. He was attached to his position by the strongest of ties. His death came as a true shock."		A few days later, the same man learned about his great, great uncle Willie, a convicted murderer who had been condemned to die in the Electric chair. Uncle Willie's entry in the family history book read like this: "Uncle William occupied a chair of applied electronics at one of our nation's leading institutions. He was attached to his position by the strongest of ties. His death came as a true shock."

		+	The greatest story ever told, the best selling book of all time, begins with a geneology--one we tend to skip right over because it is just a list of strange names tied together with a string of begats. This is a mistake, because in that long list of strange names are hundreds of encounters, hundreds of fascinating stories, some which we know well, some which are in the Bible but unfamiliar to us, and some which are completely lost to the pages of time and history.

		+	Contrary to what many of us were taught growing up, I don't think this geneology is meant to be taken literally, at least not in the modern sense of the word "geneology." At the very least, that's because it ends with Joseph, who we are told is not genetically related to Jesus at all, but is rather his adoptive father. As someone who was adopted by my own step-father, I find great comfort in that--shared genes are not required to be part of a family tradition.
		+
		+	But there are other problems with this list as a geneology: For one, it doesn't agree at all with the geneology of Jesus found in Luke, which is also supposed to represent Joseph's side of the family. It doesn't even agree with geneologies in the Old Testament of some of the people who are part of it. In fact, it doesn't even agree with itself--Matthew tells us there are three sets of fourteen generations, but no matter how you actually count his list, you come up short by quite a few.
		+
		+	The ancients were not as obsessed with historical accuracy as we are today. In fact, geneologies of ancient and even late medieval kings often contain so many figures from mythology and legend that it is highly doubtful that anyone took them literally.
		+
		+	The best modern day analogy I can think of to approximate the ancient geneology is the Facebook wall. On my facebook wall (or profile) online

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Abraham was the father of Isaac, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, 3 and Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar, and Perez the father of Hezron, and Hezron the father of Aram, 4 and Aram the father of Aminadab, and Aminadab the father of Nahshon, and Nahshon the father of Salmon, 5 and Salmon the father of Boaz by Rahab, and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth, and Obed the father of Jesse, 6 and Jesse the father of King David.
-And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah, 7 and Solomon the father of Rehoboam, and Rehoboam the father of Abijah, and Abijah the father of Asaph,[c] 8 and Asaph[d] the father of Jehoshaphat, and Jehoshaphat the father of Joram, and Joram the father of Uzziah, 9 and Uzziah the father of Jotham, and Jotham the father of Ahaz, and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah, 10 and Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, and Manasseh the father of Amos,[e] and Amos[f] the father of Josiah, 11 and Josiah the father of Jechoniah and his brothers, at the time of the deportation to Babylon.
+And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah, 7 and Solomon the father of Rehoboam, and Rehoboam the father of Abijah, and Abijah the father of Asaph, 8 and Asaph the father of Jehoshaphat, and Jehoshaphat the father of Joram, and Joram the father of Uzziah, 9 and Uzziah the father of Jotham, and Jotham the father of Ahaz, and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah, 10 and Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, and Manasseh the father of Amos, and Amos the father of Josiah, 11 and Josiah the father of Jechoniah and his brothers, at the time of the deportation to Babylon.
 And after the deportation to Babylon: Jechoniah was the father of Salathiel, and Salathiel the father of Zerubbabel, 13 and Zerubbabel the father of Abiud, and Abiud the father of Eliakim, and Eliakim the father of Azor, 14 and Azor the father of Zadok, and Zadok the father of Achim, and Achim the father of Eliud, 15 and Eliud the father of Eleazar, and Eleazar the father of Matthan, and Matthan the father of Jacob, 16 and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called the Messiah.
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 *generation count is off (14-14-12), doesn't match Luke's anyhow, or Old Testament geneologies.
 *all through Joseph anyhow.
 *four/five women:  “It is,” concludes Father Raymond Brown in his magisterial 1993 study The Birth of the Messiah, “the combination of the scandalous or irregular union and of divine intervention through the women that explains best Matthew’s choice in the genealogy.”
 *Scandal + Faithfulness + Human Initiative + Divine Intervention = Jesus the Messiah = Hope.