Difference between revisions of "Web 2.0 Article for Presbyterian Outlook"
From Neal's Wiki
(New page: ==Define Web 2.0 briefly with examples like Facebook, YouTube, WIkipedia.== ==Highlight why Web 2.0 meshes well with Presbyterian structures.== =Every member a minister = every member an e...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Define Web 2.0 briefly with examples like Facebook, YouTube, WIkipedia.== | ==Define Web 2.0 briefly with examples like Facebook, YouTube, WIkipedia.== | ||
==Highlight why Web 2.0 meshes well with Presbyterian structures.== | ==Highlight why Web 2.0 meshes well with Presbyterian structures.== | ||
| − | =Every member a minister = every member an editor/author/contributor= | + | ===Every member a minister = every member an editor/author/contributor=== |
| − | =Discern as a community --> creating as a community= | + | ===Discern as a community --> creating as a community=== |
| − | =Allows for minority voices to be heard while the majority still make the decisions= | + | ===Allows for minority voices to be heard while the majority still make the decisions=== |
| − | =Give a few brief hypothetical/real life examples of Presbyterians using Web 2.0= (we'd have to make sure we aren't repeating something from another article being written). | + | ===Give a few brief hypothetical/real life examples of Presbyterians using Web 2.0=== (we'd have to make sure we aren't repeating something from another article being written). |
Revision as of 20:22, 6 October 2007
Contents
Define Web 2.0 briefly with examples like Facebook, YouTube, WIkipedia.
Highlight why Web 2.0 meshes well with Presbyterian structures.
Every member a minister = every member an editor/author/contributor
Discern as a community --> creating as a community
Allows for minority voices to be heard while the majority still make the decisions
===Give a few brief hypothetical/real life examples of Presbyterians using Web 2.0=== (we'd have to make sure we aren't repeating something from another article being written).
