Difference between revisions of "Open Source Gospel Project"
(New page: == Free Software Methodists, Open Source Baptists, and FLOSS Presbyterians. == I remember the first time I read the wikipedia entry for "emerging church." It was well written, balanced...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==Free Software Methodists, Open Source Baptists, | |
| − | == Free Software Methodists, Open Source Baptists, | + | and FLOSS Presbyterians== |
| − | and FLOSS Presbyterians | + | |
I remember the first time I read the wikipedia entry for "emerging church." It was well written, balanced and thoughtful, and I was excited about the passion and harmony reflected among the words. And then I clicked on the link to the discussion page. | I remember the first time I read the wikipedia entry for "emerging church." It was well written, balanced and thoughtful, and I was excited about the passion and harmony reflected among the words. And then I clicked on the link to the discussion page. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
| − | == Forks == | + | ==Forks== |
Revision as of 12:38, 28 February 2009
==Free Software Methodists, Open Source Baptists, and FLOSS Presbyterians==
I remember the first time I read the wikipedia entry for "emerging church." It was well written, balanced and thoughtful, and I was excited about the passion and harmony reflected among the words. And then I clicked on the link to the discussion page.
Contributors were squabbling over word choice, calling each other ugly names, threatening to erase each other's work, and generally making a huge deal about a 1,000 word encyclopedia article. And I thought, "Ahhh. Finally, here is the church I know.
Things aren't so different in open-source culture. In fact, the name "open source" is probably one of the longest running disputes and dividing lines. Coined in 1998 by ___, it was a deliberate break from the older term "Free Software."
